Man of Iron
08-16-2008, 02:15 PM
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg117/jww85/P7170006.jpg?t=1218229374
The blades should be corrected to 5.0cm for Penae and 1.2 for Poros. Planning to start making Penae in the winter. Please tell me what you think ab00t this drawing.
Out of curiosity - why the various primary bevels, and what does varying the bevels give you in terms of improvement of performance?
The different angles of bevels on the Poros is mainly intended to reduce the resistance gradually due to the immense thickness of 6.5 mm(goof on the drawing, not 6.5cm ) The accent is at the tip, all effort is done to give it enough penetrating power while maintaining intergrity. The 20 FG degrees edge is meant for slashing purposes, and the 25 degrees HG edge is done in such fashon to make some decent edge while retaining a worthy recurve and a steady spine. Added bonus is where the two cutting edges join, the point becomes a ripping maniac. The use of primary/secundary/tertiair grinds in this effusive manner gives the blades the ability to stab, slash and rip and maybe some (light) chopping. Being the pessimist that I am, the main concerns on this design is it's weight (won't be much left after all those crazy grinds, but never done any realy calculating) and difficulty to make. There's a good reason I nickname Poros Chimera Tetra, count the incooperated styles
And this takes us to the Panae, which I intended to make it a modified kiridashi, but instead it becomes a knitty necker. The 50 degree ZG at the tip is intended to make it a tough pryer/penetrator, and the 35 degrees secundary edge is intended to rough cutting and at last the 20 HG edge for finer choirs. The main feature on this rascal is the 2 tanto points!!! IMO the first tanto at the tip will make a smoothier slasher while maintain it's agressiveness as a tanto, and the second tanto, boy it's gonna hurt
The blades should be corrected to 5.0cm for Penae and 1.2 for Poros. Planning to start making Penae in the winter. Please tell me what you think ab00t this drawing.
Out of curiosity - why the various primary bevels, and what does varying the bevels give you in terms of improvement of performance?
The different angles of bevels on the Poros is mainly intended to reduce the resistance gradually due to the immense thickness of 6.5 mm(goof on the drawing, not 6.5cm ) The accent is at the tip, all effort is done to give it enough penetrating power while maintaining intergrity. The 20 FG degrees edge is meant for slashing purposes, and the 25 degrees HG edge is done in such fashon to make some decent edge while retaining a worthy recurve and a steady spine. Added bonus is where the two cutting edges join, the point becomes a ripping maniac. The use of primary/secundary/tertiair grinds in this effusive manner gives the blades the ability to stab, slash and rip and maybe some (light) chopping. Being the pessimist that I am, the main concerns on this design is it's weight (won't be much left after all those crazy grinds, but never done any realy calculating) and difficulty to make. There's a good reason I nickname Poros Chimera Tetra, count the incooperated styles
And this takes us to the Panae, which I intended to make it a modified kiridashi, but instead it becomes a knitty necker. The 50 degree ZG at the tip is intended to make it a tough pryer/penetrator, and the 35 degrees secundary edge is intended to rough cutting and at last the 20 HG edge for finer choirs. The main feature on this rascal is the 2 tanto points!!! IMO the first tanto at the tip will make a smoothier slasher while maintain it's agressiveness as a tanto, and the second tanto, boy it's gonna hurt